the $64 trillion question: what is the jewish geopolitical plan, anyway?

http://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2014/06/03/the-64-trillion-question-what-is-the-jewish-geopolitical-plan-anyway/

The question is what the Jews want, not just in Ukraine, but globally. Do they want Eurasia to be subordinated to a global NATO dictatorship? How could they expect, once that had been accomplished, to obtain from the US global Nazis the go-ahead to rebuild the Temple, irrespective of 50 years of western objections? That would be completely improbable. On the contrary, if Usaia achieves global dictatorship, it will no longer need Israel. People who say, ah well, the Jews control Usaia, so they can do what they want using Usaia as their puppet, are failing to observe the exact limits of their power there. Usaia will always need to placate its other allies, the Arabs. This is not just a deceptive puppet show, it’s substantially real. Usaia cannot please the Arabs and the Jews at the same time, but it has to attempt to do so. Russia and China, on the contrary, can and must smash Muslim resistance to their continental hegemony. Conversely, the Muslims right across the continent of Asia must continue to fight against Russian and Chinese hegemony until Russia and China destroy them. Therefore, I think the Jews intend to cast Usaia aside and develop their new world empire in alliance with Russia and China. That would be much more logical geographically. Putin and his successors can be relied upon to support Israel against the Arabs, and against Muslims in general, because for the last 200 years or more, Russia has been the target of Muslim terrorism orchestrated by the West. The same goes for China. The resulting orientation of friends and enemies is obvious: Israel is naturally aligned with Russia and China, ie with Eurasia against Oceania. So why would they want Usaia to conquer Eurasia at all? It wouldn’t make sense, unless the Jews are really geopolitically powerless victims, which I just don’t believe – RB

Israel Shamir on Red Ice Radio

 This is interesting just because of who it is. In fact, it’s 100% pro-Putin and also 100% pro the idea (which I reject) that ‘Left’ and ‘Right’ are obselete concepts, because anti-capitalism is off the agenda and all that matters is independent nationalisms vs the Usaian global Nazi empire. If I may be allowed to continue voicing unreconstructed Marxist views, I will say this is in fact a surrender to the European Far Right parties, which may be sounding cuddly and inclusive at the moment, but will show their own Nazi colours later on, and if historical logic is anything to go by, will sell themselves to the highest bidder if they ever come to power, whether that be Usaian capital, Euian capital, Eurasian, Russian or Chinese capital, it doesn’t matter because fascism is the servant of capital wherever it finds it, and having smashed or better still absorbed the Left, it will enslave the population in just the same way that it did in the 20th century. So the ultimate struggle is not against Usaia but against fascism in whatever form it offers itself, and offering itself as a movement for national freedom is fascism’s very oldest trick. This means that Shamir, who is a Russian Orthodox Christian and quite a fervent one too, is playing the pied piper for capitalism, just as much as Gilad Atzmon, Michael Hudson, Paul Craig Roberts or any of the Counterpunch crowd. But capitalism always demands expansion, conquest and war, because it cannot survive as a steady-state system, therefore all this is useless.